
“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”
我们使用必要 Cookie 来保障开桥正常运行。经你同意,可选 Cookie 将帮我们记住你的偏好,并了解你如何使用我们的服务。你可以接受或拒绝可选 Cookie,也可以随时管理你的选择。详情请参阅我们的 隐私政策。
Same price line. Real usage decides.

For one month, 10+ of the most-used models on 开桥 are priced at DeepSeek-level — Up to 80% OFF
Same cost. Same platform. Same API endpoint. The only variable left is the model itself. Use them on your real tasks. Watch the leaderboard shift in real time. Let your token consumption cast the vote. Benchmarks tell you which model is smart. Token economics tells you which model is worth it.
Live Arena
The Token Economics Arena tracks daily token consumption across participating models. Every real call becomes a passive signal for the models users keep choosing — not just the models people talk about. In this Arena, usage decides.
People's Choice
Every 1M tokens consumed on 开桥 earns you one vote. The leaderboard tracks passive usage signal — People's Choice is where you go active: vote for the models that gave you the best outputs, the most useful answers, the results you'd actually ship.


“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
“ GLM-5.2 at deepseek pricing is incredible”

“ code is power”

“ Frontier level coding at deepseek costs, fable 5 who are you?”

“ Very cost effective model for agents.”

“ For the current price (the discounted one), it is honestly not bad. Some issues that I have, especially when it came to displaying 3D space, GLM5.2 seems to perform better than DeepSeek V4 pro. Daily is still V4 Flash”

“ Chat more like human VS DSV4P. And Coding may litttle smarter then DSV4P. But so slow that I don't want to use it in my daily agent.”

“ Cheap Fast. Smart Enough”

“ top 1”

“ 🐮🍺”

“ DeepSeek is not the best, but the most valuable.”

“ 性价比相当高”

“ Very close to opus. But much cheaper”

“ I love kimi's model.”

“ Good at natural language content, but can't solve a iOS bug....”

“ Much better on iOS coding than Qwen max; Much stupider on human language than Qwen max;”

“ Good”

“ Just tried GLM5! The responses are highly precise and natural. It's a massive boost to my daily productivity.”

“ Didn't expect to vote for this, but here we are. It just worked.”

“ The long-context part is real. I dumped a giant doc in and it didn't panic.”

“ My agent loop survived. That's basically a vote from me 😂”
“ 1M context is dangerous. Now I want to paste everything into it.”
“ It got me to a shippable version faster. That's the whole game.”

“ Fast enough that I stopped checking the clock. Good sign.”

“ I was ready to be skeptical. Then it solved the annoying part. Fine, you win.”

“ It needed a little steering, but the reasoning was strong once it locked in.”

“ Cheap-ish, fast-ish, useful-ish. Honestly? That's enough for a lot of tasks.”
“ This felt made for messy coding loops. My vote was not hard.”
“ Tool-use instructions were followed better than I expected. That got my attention.”
“ It kept my momentum. Hard to explain, but that matters a lot.”
“ Okay yeah, this is the first one that made me rethink my default model.”

“ Better that Kimi K2.7 Code and 5x faster”

“ The best model ever”
“ cheap but powerful”

“ GLM 5.2 is smarter but deepseek is way more efficient in terms of bang for your buck”
“ What a blast!”
“ GLM 5.2 is very mature”
Token receipt
Generate a shareable receipt showing your 开桥 usage, including API calls, token consumption, and campaign savings. Each receipt includes your personal referral QR code, and you’ll receive $5 in 开桥 Credits for every eligible new user who scans it and signs up.

Pick a real task. Run it across multiple models. Vote with real tokens, print your receipt, and see which model deserves your workflow.